Herman Cain dares to say: “The Gray Lady dons a white sheet and hood”


Amazing.  Blessed be Herman Cain.  Tell it like is, Mr. Cain.  But, now, let’s wait for the deafening silence in response.  Or, much more likely, get ready for the vitriol headed your way.  You are going to be vilified, even accused of playing their  proverbial race card the wrong way.

Sorry to say it, Mr. Cain: been there, done that.  We Cubans have been sparring with this ugly-ass dragon for over half a century.  No one who worships this Old Gray Idol — not a single reader — is likely to change their opinion about it, or about African Americans, or “Hispanics,” any of the class-race-and-gender dogmas it proclaims.  Most of its idolatrous readers are white, well-educated, and affluent.  And most of them are racists, though they refuse to acknowledge it, simply because their condescension is their worst blind spot and their definition of “racism” is so twisted.

The Herminator’s courageous complaint could be compared to an atheist mounting the pulpit in a fundamentalist church or mosque and telling the congregation that they’re all deluded.

Too bad. This would be a much better country, and a much better world, without this stinking newsprint idol of the so-called thinking class and the insidious racism and condescending neocolonialism it constantly defends.  For most of its readers, this newspaper is their  true religion.  And most of them tend to be fundamentalists.  Their thinking is normally so in sync with what it has to say — because it reflects their world view, shapes it, and simultaneously affirms it –that anything that contradicts it is immediately perceived not just as wrong, but as stupid or evil.

The New York Times is a racist newspaper

Published by: Herman Cain on Friday December 21st, 2012

Apparently there is a professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania named Adolph Reed Jr. Professor Reed considers it a “puzzle” that there are black Republicans, and writes off said black Republicans as “tokens” who are so deplorable, he doesn’t even want to hear about them anymore.

That was pretty much the theme of Professor Reed’s rant in the Wednesday New York Times about the appointment of U.S. Rep. Tim Scott to replace U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina. Like me, Scott is that most curious of animals – a black Republican – and Professor Reed makes it clear that he considers black Republicans to be little more than Stepin Fetchits, soulless black people who are willing to serve the white master at the expense of their true brethren:

Just as white Southern Democrats once used cynical manipulations — poll taxes, grandfather clauses, literacy tests — to get around the 15th Amendment, so modern-day Republicans have deployed blacks to undermine black interests, as when President Ronald Reagan named Samuel R. Pierce Jr. to weaken the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Clarence M. Pendleton to enfeeble the Commission on Civil Rights and Clarence Thomas to enervate the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

This, Professor Reed sums up thusly: “The trope of the black conservative has retained a man-bites-dog newsworthiness that is long past its shelf life. Clichés about fallen barriers are increasingly meaningless; symbols don’t make for coherent policies. Republicans will not gain significant black support unless they take policy positions that advance black interests. No number of Tim Scotts — or other cynical tokens — will change that.”

So it’s worth asking, then: What, exactly, are “black interests”? To hear Professor Reed tell it, blacks are a monolithic group of people whose best interests are served when they can be recipients of redistributionist policies at the hands of big government. Let me simplify that for you: He thinks black people need welfare, and can’t make it under the kinds of free-market policies advocated by the likes of Samuel Pierce, Clarence Pendleton, Clarence Thomas and Tim Scott.

And Herman Cain.

Since Professor Reed is also a black man, I wish him well in dealing with his obvious self-loathing. But he might learn a lot if he spent a little time moving in the circles I move in. He would meet lots of highly accomplished black men and women who have pursued their dreams in the capitalist system and have done exceedingly well. They vote Republican because they understand that free-market policies open up this same kind of opportunity for others.

Any newspaper that would publish a piece denigrating blacks as needing the benevolence of big government in order to serve their interests is obviously racist and deserves widespread censure for making such an insensitive and racially biased editorial decision.

It’s a shame the New York Times is such a racist newspaper.



3 thoughts on “Herman Cain dares to say: “The Gray Lady dons a white sheet and hood”

  1. ” Most of its idolatrous readers are white, well-educated, and affluent. And most of them are racists, though they refuse to acknowledge it, simply because their condescension is their worst blind spot and their definition of “racism” is so twisted.” So true. I’d like to share an example of liberal, “subtle racism” I recently witnessed. I’m in a elevator with one other person, a “liberal” aquaintance, who is white, well-educated, and probably somewhat affluent. A women belonging to a minority group with a little girl, perhaps 4-5 years old, joins us during a floor stop. The liberal looks them over, says nothing, then after a lengthy pause says to the women, “Your little girl is so cute, just lovely.” The minority woman nods and says thank-you, and looks away. My liberal companion looks at me, leans in and whispers, referring to the child, “and she’s so well-dressed to” she smiles, feeling so nice about her tolerant self. I am convinced that the liberal mind is sick; sick from living in their own putrid hate which they deal with by denouncing and accusing others of all that evil they themselves harbor in their hearts. Racism, sexism, elitism, fanaticism… all the isms.

  2. Reed’s world is academia, and he knows how that game is played and what it takes to advance and rise in it, especially in a field like political science. This evidence implies his students cannot possibly be getting a balanced or objective view of the subject, but he’s hardly worse than the media, and the media is explicitly supposed and honor-bound to be balanced and objective. It is anything but, and the New York Times is exhibit A.

    The liberal/leftist position on black people is as much racist as it is cynically self-serving: the point is to use blacks by keeping them dependent on liberal “favors” and thus perpetual clients of liberal politicians. Unfortunately, the shit works, or it certainly has so far. It’s all too easy to take advantage of people who not only let you but like and rerward you for it.

Comments are closed.