September 08, 2005

Bush = Scapegoat

Much has been said and written in the blogosphere about the MSM's blaming of George W. Bush and his administration for the misery in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina.

The Miami Herald joins the parade of MSM Bush-blamers, with no less than two columns published in yesterday's edition blaming Bush for everything from not funding improvements to the levee system to not sending aid down there in time. While the administration can and should take some of the blame, the stuff that's being written is so terribly lopsided against Bush.

The two columns were written by Ana Menendez and Michael Putney. This post will focus on Menendez's column due to its entertainment value and connection to Cuba.

Following is the column, with my e-mail to Menendez below the fold:

If Castro helps us . . . we need help

By Ana Menendez

It's time we started thanking Fidel Castro for his generosity.

For years he's been sending us his finest baseball players, musicians and ballet dancers. Before Osama bin Laden upstaged him, he toiled faithfully and even enthusiastically as the official state villain. He even inspired us to open our very own Cuban jail.

And now, seeing the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, he is moved to offer us 1,100 of his highly trained doctors.

Gracias, Fidel.

VERY GENEROUS

The latest offer is an act of extreme selflessness, given that Cubans already privately complain about Castro's habit of sending doctors abroad when they are needed at home. Then there's the lingering resentment over the way top officials get exclusive access to the best care.

But why dwell on negatives? Every system has its problems, after all. So let's back up.

Thank you, Fidel. Really, it's very generous of you. But you don't need to worry about us: We've got it all under control.

I mean, we're a superpower, not some third-world kleptocracy.

Halliburton got all its contracts fair and square; its former association with our vice president had nothing to do with it.

And our royal family is best friends with Saudi's royal family only because they have a lot in common.

It's true that this recent hurricane caused a lot of pain locally.

But aside from the Army Corps of Engineers, The New Orleans Times-Picayune and the Louisiana delegation, who could have predicted it?

As Michael Chertoff, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security told The New York Times: ''Nature was unhelpful.'' Blame her for not giving sufficient warning.

We're a great and powerful country. We've got great scientists, and so long as they are God-fearing, we heed their advice. Above all, we have great and visionary leaders.

Yes, the federal government drastically slashed hurricane and flood-control funding this year, but we had other priorities.

OUR GREAT CITIES

We have a world-class military fighting a war in Iraq. Certainly Fidel Castro, of all people, knows the high cost of exporting revolution.

Thankfully, the monthly $5 billion war bill is also being spread to future generations, so it's not as bad as it sounds.

We've figured out a way to amass debt and keep taxes low. Pretty neat, no?

Because of our success, a lot of envious people want to kill us. That's why we spend so much more on preventing terrorism than on preparing for natural disasters.

Who could have imagined that the real big killer would have a name like Katrina?

It's true that the storm revealed some economic inequalities in New Orleans, but the city was an exception. Our other great American cities just keep getting better and better.

In New York, a study conducted for The Times found that the very rich make 52 times what the very poor make, an income disparity that is on par with Namibia.

Congratulations to Namibia, which used to be considered part of the Third World.

Given all this, I don't see how we, a rich and powerful country, could ever accept aid from a basket-case like Cuba.

TRADE FOR RUMSFELD

On the other hand, it is good to be a little humble.

Perhaps we could work out a mutually beneficial trade. An idea occurred to me after seeing photos of Donald Rumsfeld at the makeshift hospital in New Orleans: How about we go ahead and take those 1,100 doctors and in return we send Rumsfeld to Cuba? I know. It's not exactly a fair trade, seeing as the doctors are highly skilled. But Rumsfeld can be very charming. He and Castro might even hit it off.

And, naturally, we would take him back just as soon as those Cuban doctors announced they were ready to go home.

My e-mail to Ana:

Ana,

I didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I read your column this morning. I understand you were being tongue-in-cheek when you called Castro "selfless" for offering aid to the victims of Katrina. However, your sarcastic and pointed shots at the federal government, and the Bush administration in particular, were mostly uncalled for.

You follow the liberal mainstream media line quite well - Blame Bush, he's too worried about Iraq to care about his own people, especially those who are minorities and poor. I'm not going to contest your shots at the administration, it's just not worth it.

However, as a scientist who works for the federal government, I take particular exception to this comment you made: "We're a great and powerful country. We've got great scientists, and so long as they are God-fearing, we heed their advice."

As long as they are God-fearing? Are you implying that only Bush-friendly scientists are believed by the federal government? If so, then that is a huge and irresponsible discredit to those who worked their butts off to warn the Gulf Coast of the impending storm. The director of the National Hurricane Center, a scientific government institution, called New Orleans Mayor Nagin and Louisiana Governor Blanco a couple of days before the storm's arrival to personally warn them of what was coming. It was only after that call that the local and state governments got moving to start evacuations. Why weren't they watching the storm closer? Why weren't they taking preliminary actions to evacuate New Orleans, a process that takes days, not hours, to complete?

Only Nagin and Blanco, both Democrats, know the answer.

You also threw out the "Bush slashed hurricane and flood-control funds" line. You forgot to add Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter....well you get the picture. Don't you think it's perfectly reasonable and expected of local and state governments to do whatever it takes to protect their communities? Then why didn't either local or state governments take action to fund levee and dam improvements? It's been known for many years that the improvements were needed.

Well, it seems that they were too busy approving $138 million for building the Superdome back in 1975. Fast-forwarding to recent times, Governor Blanco was too busy travelling to Cuba to sell her agricultural goods to the devil for cash. I get it...she was waiting for Castro's cash to pay for the levee improvements, no?

Sincerely,

Robert

Menendez's reply was very brief. I don't think she liked what I said very much.

Dear Robert: Thank you for your thoughts. I respect your opinion and the right to voice it.

Regards,

Ana

Posted by Robert M at September 8, 2005 10:37 AM

Comments

I guess the only part I really liked about Ana Menendez's article is the first paragraph stating - "If Castro helps us ... we need help."... right now what I am really worried about is Senator Martinez. Has he gone crazy or has he always been so totally disconnected with the Cuban American community????? I know Orlando isn't exactly Little Havana but come on!... I hope all of Hialeah is calling and complaining. In DC we were all worried when his original Cuba point man had to leave (he was also behind the Terri Schiavo memo) and the Senators Washington office was left with no Cuba experts... scary! I guess we now see the results!

Posted by: Sirimba at September 8, 2005 11:11 AM

What the White House needs to do at this point is to take the gloves off and come out swinging - because the facts will show where the source of incompetence and inaction really lies. So it is time to hammer those facts home. Whether or not that is perceived as "insensitive" or "politically incorrect," by certain ideologues or self-appointed "activists," whose opinions should be disregarded at this point.

Bush should tell the whiners and finger-pointers to come, get a bucket, and start bailing water out of the 17th street canal in the Big Easy. Failing in that, let them be handed a shovel so they can work on the baseless, whiny shit they're spouting.

Posted by: Alberto Quiroga at September 8, 2005 11:12 AM

Sirimba,

As I stated in another post, perhpas calling fidel's bluff on sending doctors isnt a bad thing. Does anyone with any familiarity of castro's political machinations truly believe he would allow himself to be set up for a mass exodus to the US of his prized medical slaves?

Seriously, doesnt anyone else think that the majority of those doctors in Cuba are just praying for the US to accept so they can defect?

think about it.

Posted by: Val Prieto at September 8, 2005 11:28 AM

I feel the same way Val. Let's call out Fidel's bluff. He only proposed it because he knew that our government and Bush were not going to accept his offer. Therefore again making our country look like the bad guys in front of the world and him Mr. Humanitarian.

I'm sure he knows that more than half those doctors will not return if they are sent here unless he threatens them with hurting some family member if they don't.

I say that he should take the 75 ton of medicine he is offering us and give it to the people that live in Cuba and are always beggin those other countries for the medication they need and can't get in Cuba. Shouldn't he be taken care of his own first before anyone?

Damn Right!!!

Posted by: Ileana Olivera at September 8, 2005 12:59 PM

Bush does deserve some blame for not funding the reinforcement of the levees. Clinton too. His government refused the same thing in 98. The coverage may be lopsided against Bush (people are taking advantage of this opportunity to bash him), but he does deserve some of the criticism.

Posted by: Meyer at September 8, 2005 01:01 PM

I'm surprised this piece got past the editing desk - it's an inarticulate argument blending facts and fiction and tons of sarcasm. As an essay, it's a failure.

Posted by: A.M. Mora y Leon at September 8, 2005 01:16 PM

Meyer,

I have been involved with construction project for GSA and other federal agaencies, and from my experience, in order for these levees to have been in place pror to the storm, the work would have had to have been implemented during Bush I. The amounts of beaurocracy at the federal level is insanely ridiculous.

Posted by: Val Prieto at September 8, 2005 01:29 PM

On the funding of the levees, I read elsewhere that there was plenty of federal dough sent over the years but that it had been misdirected by Louisiana's own lawmakers. This isn't the same as Bush or Clinton not funding them. He may have recently cut it off because the funds were misused in the first place.

Yes, there are plenty of dropped balls at every level, but let's not get to the point of, "My hair got split ends; it's Bush's fault!!" It doesn't help the situation at all.

Posted by: FL Mom at September 8, 2005 02:06 PM

One line in Ana Menéndez's essay is priceless: "In New York, a study conducted for The Times found that the very rich make 52 times what the very poor make, an income disparity that is on par with Namibia. Congratulations to Namibia, which used to be considered part of the Third World." Exactly the way to view this study, even though I know she was being sarcastic.

Posted by: M.A.T. at September 8, 2005 03:23 PM

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/world/cuba/12586326.htm

what surprised me was that there hasnt been much talk about the mel martinez comments..

Posted by: daniel at September 8, 2005 03:53 PM

How about sending them rice cookers in exchange for the doctors?

Posted by: Scott at September 8, 2005 03:59 PM

Working for the Louisiana government (not high up,so my expert opinion is not so expert) I feel the best way to pass out blame for what happened is 80% state/local and 20% federal. By this I don't mean what should have been done over the past few decades (i.e. levee strenghtening and coastal restoration) because to dole out blame for those mistakes would probably lead to the imprisonment of several dead governors and congressmen...not to mention the derission of the administrations of nearly every President since LBJ. More to the point, as far as what could have been done from Saturday morning (when Louisiana awoke to learn that Katrina was headed our way)onward, the blame should almost all be levelled at state and local officials. Because of how both federal and Louisiana law was written concerning disaster preparedness and response, tight cooperation between Governor Blanco, Mayor Nagin and FEMA was required. The Feds couldn't move until the State and local governments requested help and that is where the real trouble occurred. Federal help was already prepositioned just outside the area to be hit by Sunday (the night before the Hurricane made landfall) awaiting permission from the locals to enter...none was given. National guard under Governor Blanco's command were not utilized effectively and have, despite near requests by FEMA and Bush, not even now been federalized (Blanco must agree to have them federalized in all cases except insurrection). To me it seems the failure of FEMA and Bush were hampered so greatly by the lack of cooperation from and between Blanco and Nagin that successful prevention and response were nearly impossible. Also I always tended to think that Hurricane Katrina had a little something to do with the way things turned out.

Posted by: jcanfi2 at September 8, 2005 04:04 PM

Well, now we know who is to blame for the "Dry Foot/Wet Foot" policy still being in place. Mel Martînez: that well-connected Republican and totally disconnected Cuban. His recent comments about being "grateful" for Castro's proferred aid have exposed him as a worldclass useful idiot, completely divorced from his Cuban roots and reality. We wonder what other kinds of advice he has given the president. Perhaps he is responsible for the Bush administration's failure to implement the provisions of the Helms-Burton Act and its acquiescense in sending trade missions to Cuba, such as Gov. Blanco's. If Mel is Bush's idea of a Cuban-American, we are all lost. And Florida is lost to the Republicans.

Posted by: M.A.T. at September 8, 2005 04:13 PM

I posted my own response to Ana Hernandez, yesterday.

I think that she is trying to do a MoDo lite kinda' thing. It's not working, though.

Posted by: SWLiP at September 8, 2005 06:01 PM

Who to blame?
First, blame the storm.
No storm, no levee breach.
Second, blame the first responders responsible for....first response: The Mayor of New Orleans is the "responsible" party for the basic safety of his city.
Third, it is becoming cleat that Gov. Blanco is wrong woman for the job: She actually prevented First Aid from being pre-positioned in the state, and then delayed aid getting to the Superdome.
Fourth, yes Prez Bush is the Exec in Chief. He has the responsibility to lead even though the Gov. and Mayor behaved as dithering idiots, are in the opposition party and have demonstrated that when the giong gets tough they melt down. Prez. Bush has to ultimately take responsibility becuz the buck stops there.
That said, the system can't work if the elected people who are in charge of the first response don't respond worth a flip.

Posted by: ebnelson at September 8, 2005 10:30 PM

I was reading the news today, and truly I am dissapointed with Mel Martinez....I think he is another FLIP-FLOPPER in the US Senate!
God HELP US!!

Posted by: carmen at September 9, 2005 12:18 AM

Don't know, but the way you act defending the Bush administration reminds me the way Chavez supporters defend his goverment when a similar calamity occurs in Venezuela: not his fault, it has already done by others, when he arrived it was like that, etc etc.

Posted by: K-2 at September 9, 2005 04:40 AM

All that I can say is that Ana "cubana resentida" Menendez is a mediocre pretentious author and that her editorial/journalistic skills are just as bad.

Posted by: Ray at September 9, 2005 10:13 AM

That lady had her mind obscured by the time whe wrote the article, I hope it was a temporary episode not a permanent state of mind.
From blaming only Bush, to bringing Fidel, science, god, namibia!!, etc is a tremendous demonstration of not being able to make a single clear point.
An old strategy: When you cannot shed light into a problem, bring more problems on the top of it!

Posted by: Calixto Sanchez at September 9, 2005 05:04 PM

Don't forget that Ana Menendez signed the useless petition to reinstate Jim DeFede at the Herald, although she "forgot" to mention that in the article that she wrote about him.

Posted by: delacova at September 9, 2005 08:25 PM

I understand a molehill aspiring to mountain status, but a troll?

I love idiots who use keyword searches to find a comment section to dribble their spew in. It saves them all that tedious stuff like reading and thinking.

It wouldn't surprise me to find out K-2's just a journalism school drop-out. He's got the ad hominem down, but he forgot the bit about finding a forum where his stupidity wouldn't be challenged.

Posted by: aelfheld at September 10, 2005 05:23 PM

Well Mr aelfheld, insulting me would not change anything. And no, I am not a journalist, I do not even want to be one, but what I said is true: yeah, the problems where there before the storm, even before his term; yes, he is not the only responsable; and yes, this is the same kind of answer you get from your average chavista. And that's the pat when they start saying: the media is lying (you call them in USA liberal), now he is responsible of everything, etc etc. Same speech different speaker. The problem stays.

Posted by: K-2 at September 12, 2005 12:19 PM


You have reached an old version of a post at BabaluBlog.com, probably because a search engine referred you or you followed an old link. If you'd like to view this post at its new home you can do so by clicking here and searching for the post on our new site. Tip: Take note of the date of this post and use our calendar feature to find it in its new home.