March 24, 2006
Are we living in Bizarro World?
Read this excerpt:
WASHINGTON (AP) - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.
Have we as a nation lost our f---ing minds? Hutchinson Whampoa is a company with deep ties to the Chinese Communist miltary. Are we inviting the disaster to happen? Contact your Congressmen and Senators and cry out in a loud voice that you will not support this. This outrage dwarfs the Dubai port deal in my view. Read the whole article by clicking below.
U.S. Hiring Hong Kong Co. to Scan Nukes
Mar 23, 8:32 PM (ET)
By TED BRIDIS and JOHN SOLOMONWASHINGTON (AP) - In the aftermath of the Dubai ports dispute, the Bush administration is hiring a Hong Kong conglomerate to help detect nuclear materials inside cargo passing through the Bahamas to the United States and elsewhere.
The administration acknowledges the no-bid contract with Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. represents the first time a foreign company will be involved in running a sophisticated U.S. radiation detector at an overseas port without American customs agents present.
Freeport in the Bahamas is 65 miles from the U.S. coast, where cargo would be likely to be inspected again. The contract is currently being finalized.
The administration is negotiating a second no-bid contract for a Philippine company to install radiation detectors in its home country, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press. At dozens of other overseas ports, foreign governments are primarily responsible for scanning cargo.
While President Bush recently reassured Congress that foreigners would not manage security at U.S. ports, the Hutchison deal in the Bahamas illustrates how the administration is relying on foreign companies at overseas ports to safeguard cargo headed to the United States.
Hutchison Whampoa is the world's largest ports operator and among the industry's most-respected companies. It was an early adopter of U.S. anti-terror measures. But its billionaire chairman, Li Ka-Shing, also has substantial business ties to China's government that have raised U.S. concerns over the years.
"Li Ka-Shing is pretty close to a lot of senior leaders of the Chinese government and the Chinese Communist Party," said Larry M. Wortzel, head of a U.S. government commission that studies China security and economic issues. But Wortzel said Hutchison operates independently from Beijing, and he described Li as "a very legitimate international businessman."
"One can conceive legitimate security concerns and would hope either the Homeland Security Department or the intelligence services of the United States work very hard to satisfy those concerns," Wortzel said.
Three years ago, the Bush administration effectively blocked a Hutchison subsidiary from buying part of a bankrupt U.S. telecommunications company, Global Crossing Ltd. (GLBC), on national security grounds.
And a U.S. military intelligence report, once marked "secret," cited Hutchison in 1999 as a potential risk for smuggling arms and other prohibited materials into the United States from the Bahamas.
Hutchison's port operations in the Bahamas and Panama "could provide a conduit for illegal shipments of technology or prohibited items from the West to the PRC (People's Republic of China), or facilitate the movement of arms and other prohibited items into the Americas," the now-declassified assessment said.
The CIA currently has no security concerns about Hutchison's port operations, and the administration believes the pending deal with the foreign company would be safe, officials said.
Supervised by Bahamian customs officials, Hutchison employees will drive the towering, truck-like radiation scanner that moves slowly over large cargo containers and scans them for radiation that might be emitted by plutonium or a radiological weapon.
Any positive reading would set off alarms monitored simultaneously by Bahamian customs inspectors at Freeport and by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials working at an anti-terrorism center 800 miles away in northern Virginia. Any alarm would prompt a closer inspection of the cargo, and there are multiple layers of security to prevent tampering, officials said.
"The equipment operates itself," said Bryan Wilkes, a spokesman for the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, the agency negotiating the contract. "It's not going to be someone standing at the controls pressing buttons and flipping switches."
A lawmaker who helped lead the opposition to the Dubai ports deal isn't so confident. Neither are some security experts. They question whether the U.S. should pay a foreign company with ties to China to keep radioactive material out of the United States.
"Giving a no-bid contract to a foreign company to carry out the most sensitive security screening for radioactive materials at ports abroad raises many questions," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.
A low-paid employee with access to the screening equipment could frustrate international security by studying how the equipment works and which materials set off its alarms, warned a retired U.S. Customs investigator who specialized in smuggling cases.
"Money buys a lot of things," Robert Sheridan said. "The fact that foreign workers would have access to how the United States screens various containers for nuclear material and how this technology scrutinizes the containers - all those things allow someone with a nefarious intention to thwart the screening."
The Hutchison deal in the Bahamas was flagged in a report in October by ATS Worldwide Services, a Florida firm that identifies potential risks for private-sector and government clients. Company officials said they shared the report with some officials in Congress, the military and law enforcement.
Other experts discounted concerns. They cited Hutchison's reputation as a leading ports company and said the United States inevitably must rely for some security on large commercial operators in the global maritime industry.
"We must not allow an unwarranted fear of foreign ownership or involvement in offshore operations to impair our ability to protect against nuclear weapons being smuggled into this country," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., a member of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. "We must work with these foreign companies."
A former Coast Guard commander, Stephen Flynn, said foreign companies sometimes prove more trustworthy - and susceptible to U.S. influence - than governments.
"It's a very fragile system," Flynn said. Foreign companies "recognize the U.S. has the capacity and willingness to exercise a kill switch if something goes wrong."
A spokesman for Hutchison's ports subsidiary, Anthony Tam, said the company "is a strong supporter in port security initiatives."
"In the case of the Bahamas, our local personnel are working alongside with U.S. customs officials to identify and inspect U.S.-bound containers that could be carrying radioactive materials," Tam said.
However, there are no U.S. customs agents checking any cargo containers at the Hutchison port in Freeport. Under the contract, no U.S. officials would be stationed permanently in the Bahamas with the radiation scanner.
The administration is finalizing the contract amid a national debate over maritime security sparked by the furor over now-abandoned plans by Dubai-owned DP World to take over significant operations at major U.S. ports.
Hutchison operates the sprawling Freeport Container Port on Grand Bahama Island. Its subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings, has operations in more than 20 countries but none in the United States.
Contract documents, obtained by The Associated Press, indicate Hutchison will be paid roughly $6 million. The contract is for one year with options for three years.
The Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration is negotiating the Bahamas contract under a $121 million security program it calls the "second line of defense." Wilkes, the NNSA spokesman, said the Bahamian government dictated that the U.S. give the contract to Hutchison.
"It's their country, their port. The driver of the mobile carrier is the contractor selected by their government. We had no say or no choice," he said. "We are fortunate to have allies who are signing these agreements with us."
Some security experts said that is a weak explanation in the Bahamas, with its close reliance on the United States. The administration could insist that the Bahamas permit U.S. Customs agents to operate at the port, said Albert Santoli, an expert on national security issues in Asia and the Pacific.
"Why would they not accept that?" said Santoli, a former national security aide to Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif. "There is an interest in the Bahamas and every other country in the region to make sure the U.S. stays safe and strong. That's how this should be negotiated."
Flynn, the former Coast Guard commander, agreed the Bahamas would readily accept such a proposal but said the U.S. is short of trained customs agents to send overseas.
Contract documents obtained by the AP show at least one other foreign company is involved in the U.S. radiation-detection program.
A separate, no-bid $4 million contract the Bush administration is negotiating would pay a Manila-based company, International Container Terminal Services Inc., to install radiation detectors at the Philippines' largest port.
The U.S. says the Manila company is not being paid to operate the radiation monitors once they are installed. But two International Container executives and a senior official at the government's Philippine Nuclear Research Institute said the company will run the detectors on behalf of the institute and the country's customs bureau. U.S. officials said they will investigate further how the Filipinos plan to use the equipment.
---
Associated Press writers Bill Foreman in Hong Kong and Jim Gomez in Manila contributed to this story.
(H/T The Drudge Report)
Posted by George Moneo at March 24, 2006 09:50 AM
Comments
I guess it is the new world order Bush sr. was talking about.
Posted by: mandingo
at March 24, 2006 10:06 AM
The fox is guarding the hen house.
Aren't there Norwegians or someone else who can do this port stuff? Have Americans forgotten how to do everything, or is it that everyone else can beat our prices?
Isn't a Chinese company running the Panama Canal now, too?
Posted by: Scott
at March 24, 2006 10:10 AM
Mark Levin, a NY lawyer turned radio host and all around sharp knife, had the best expose of this fiasco and this company yesterday on his radio program. Seems like the US govt. is turning a blind eye and deaf ear to the danger of the red communists just because they dress themselves as entrepeneurs & capitalists ..... all run behind the scenes by their ruthless and opportunistic dictators, who rake in all the money from investments from Walmart to Hutchinson.
Levin will probably post his comments on NRO at http://levin.nationalreview.com/ but if you have access to live stream, his program comes on between 6:00 and 8:00 PM EST on WABC radio in NYC; you can also hear him at WMAL in DC and WBAP in Dallas. He's great to listen to and quite funny.
Posted by: Gigi
at March 24, 2006 10:12 AM
It's my understanding this is the SAME company that's running the Panama Canal.
Posted by: Paxety
at March 24, 2006 11:48 AM
Gigi, I have been a fan of Mark Levin -- The Great One or F. Lee Levin as he also called -- for years now. I am comfrotable that he is on the right side of this issue (no pun intended).
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 11:48 AM
This is just more xenophobic hysteria. The company is very much independent of the PLA.
Posted by: jsb
at March 24, 2006 12:18 PM
A Chinese company running the Panama Canal and Iran with nuclear weapons. Thanks Jimmy Carter!
Posted by: Scott
at March 24, 2006 12:18 PM
JSB, you are wrong to the very bottoms of your feet. Go here and read this column. Then go to Smith's website and read the voluminous research he has on Red China. If, after reading all of that, you still think it's "xenophobic hysteria" then all I can do is wish you luck with your Mandarin Chinese lessons...
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 02:31 PM
JSB, one more thing: Those that forget the lessons of history are condemned to repeat them.
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 02:34 PM
George, the article you point to proves nothing with regards to the company being anything other than independent of the PLA as I stated. The point is technical, I'll grant you. But my comment stands, especially given the connect the dots approach you use. If you have any specific evidence that the PLA has influence with this company, I'd like to see it.
Posted by: jsb
at March 24, 2006 05:40 PM
You have to go to softwar.net and read the extensive documentation Smith has on the company's president, Li Kashing (sic) affectionately referred to a "Minister" in ChiCom circles. We are free to be naive about the Chinese Government's intentions -- just as America was naive about castro -- but we're going to pay an awful price down the line because of it.
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 05:53 PM
We've got el gran manisero trasnochado Jimmah Carter to thank for Panama Canal & Iran blunders, and BJ Clinton for selling his pants (and ours) to the ChiComs in exchange for campaign ca$$h. Now it's W's turn at bat, and what do we see??
I'd like to know who's pushing all this crap, whether they are Clintonian retreads who are still in government service (translation: leftover bureaucrats), or misguided staffers who bow at the altar of the global economy at the expense of our security.
Maybe both. If so, apaga y vete.
Posted by: Gigi
at March 24, 2006 07:07 PM
Gigi, I am beginning to fear the direction we are taking.
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 09:27 PM
JSB, if you are interested I'll send you the PDF with the articles on softwar.net regarding Hutchinson Whampoa. Or, you can do a search and find it on the site. It's simple research, if you really want to find out what's going on...
Posted by: George L. Moneo
at March 24, 2006 10:59 PM
George: As the commercial goes (and my mother says), "Aqui lo que importa es el CA$$$H!"
THAT, in my view, is the direction we're headed to, because of the erosion of basic values in the general culture, in my humble opinion. Look around: the networks refuse to run any 9/11 tape; there are lawsuits over the pledge of allegiance; border agents find empty food cans with Arab writing, along with copies of the Koran and prayer rugs across the border; and because there has not been any major attack since 2001, there is a false sense of security, a smugness that causes the politicians to kow tow to special interests: they don't give a rip. Let the ChiComs run the show, as long as we can still hoard their cheapstuff at Walmart.
Like I said in a previous post, we are in dire need of patriots. Instead of assimilating, the new waves of immigrants are hitched to the mother country, not their adoptive country. (Just take a ride to south TX and AZ.) It's a symptom of a deeper problem, in my unsolicited opinion: as a society, we pay lip service to our country, while we sell it down the river. We don't care enough about it, because we've taken it for granted for so long.
And that goes for the people in the Bush administration too. The leftists chase power, and the right-wingers appear to chase money. That is the only explanation I see for this obsession with giving our ports to foreign savage regimes.
Sigh - I better get off my soap box.
