March 30, 2007
Santana on Che
Rather than speculate on what Santana feels about Che Guevera, the butcher of La Cabaña, perhaps it would be instructive to hear from Santana in his own words.
On April 29, 2005 (just 11 days after Santana's management issued a statement about the Oscars appearance and just 8 days after he posed for a picture with Emilio Estefan in Las Vegas) the Argentine newspaper, El Imparcial, published the following remarks made by Santana at a press conference:
He asserted, “I feel that it is essential that a (Ernesto) ''Che'' (Guevara), a (subcomandante) Marcos, and a (Emiliano) Zapata exist. Hopefully, in the future, it won't be necessary for them to kill”.
Obviously Santana values what Guevera did, and not just as a "soulful young man portrayed in [The Motorcyle Diaries]."
Contrary to what his management claimed it seems that Santana indeed appreciates the "hatred, anger [and] revolutionary ruthlessness displayed when Che Guevara was a revolutionary leader in Cuba."
Santana is not, as some people have speculated, just a perpetually high idealist without a clue about Guevara's bloody history. He knows that Guevara is a killer and justifies the killing as "necessary."
Keep on telling me that this is no big deal.
Posted by Henry Louis Gomez at March 30, 2007 05:45 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.babalublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/hut.cgi/4918
Comments
Of course Santana knew! He knew before the Oscars and he knew when his buddy Emilio invited him on the album. Emilio also knew all about it but still decided to go with Che loving Santana and arrogantly ignore what all of us would think. That's what can happen when you become rich and famous; you lose touch with all the little people. I agree with other posters that it would be a mistake to just wait for the album to come out. That's like Biscet just waiting for castro to fall. Just waiting for the album is exactly what the E$stefans would want us to do.
Posted by: Jose Aguirre
at March 30, 2007 06:24 PM
Santana speaks and thinks like a high school dropout.
Posted by: delacova
at March 30, 2007 07:34 PM
SATANA - I MEAN SANTANA IS LEFTIST SCUM.
THE ESTEFANS SHOULD BE ASHAMED.
Posted by: reliapundit - the astute blogger
at March 30, 2007 07:43 PM
I never doubted from the beginning that the Estefans knew what Santana said and just chose to overlook it in favor of the CHAAAA CHINGGGG that his presence on 90 Millas would bring in. I'd like to say Emilio is above it, but I think he was counting on people forgetting about Santana and his love of che or on people brushing it off as the ramblings of a pothead but since this is not the case, it's making him and Gloria look like money is more important. Emilio did not get where is today by being naive-he knows what he is doing, he just misunderstood the passion of the "little people." He may still be a castro-loathing Cuban-American but he hasn't been a "little person" in a longgggg time.
Claudia
Posted by: Claudia
at March 30, 2007 08:27 PM
Here is another quote from the same statement by santana "En algunas ciudades del mundo los perros comen mejor que los habitantes de Chiapas", señaló Santana al rotativo.
Añadió que "por eso no me gusta el Papa ni El Vaticano. Me invitaron cinco veces a tocar en El Vaticano. Jamás voy a ir. Me duele la gente pobre: no puedo tolerar que una institución como El Vaticano tenga valores por tres trillones de dólares".
Posted by: KeyWasted
at March 30, 2007 09:52 PM
So Santana doesn't compromise HIS principals, but we should compromise ours to "understand" Glorita and Company?
Santana isn't tolerant and understanding when HE believes in something, but we have to tolerate all sorts of insults and contempt towards our suffering.
Santana vehemently defends HIS idols, but we can't contradict him or display our disgust.
If the Estefans were indeed good friends with this lowlife, then they knew what he was about. They (Estefans and Santana) can piss on an entire community, but WE are attacking "our own" when we hit back. Please spare me the double standard.
This whole thing gets rottener and rottener by the day.
There is absolutely nothing to justify this behavior.
They deserve everything they get and more.
Posted by: mavi
at March 30, 2007 10:22 PM
Workin' in a factory for 20 hours a day,
all the money you've earned being handed
to the state, no freedom to speak your
mind. With all those pluses I still can't
understand how you guys maintain your
anti-Che stance, and condemn the shining
Utopia he created.
Posted by: ac#1
at March 30, 2007 11:49 PM
I keep hearing don't attack one of our own. Well one of our own attacked us, face it. We seem to have a double standard here. One of our own would not have put the Cuban American community in this position. If we just look past what "one of our own did" we will not have the moral right to criticize other things. We must be careful as our credibility is at stake when we turn a blind, or at least squinting, eye at one of our own.
Posted by: pototo
at March 31, 2007 07:01 AM
That's really a shame, because musically (although not on this issue), Santana is a huge influence on me musically; a pioneer of latin rock. But there's no justification for the bloodshed of innocents, regardless of how "noble" you think the cause may be.
Posted by: Dave Sandoval
at March 31, 2007 01:46 PM
Dave,
You see what I mean. This guy isn't a college student who thinks Guevara is Jim Morrison. He is a true believer. So the question remains, why ask him to appear on THIS RECORD about Cuba unless he renounces that?
Posted by: Henry "Conductor" Gomez
at March 31, 2007 01:51 PM
Why don't we sponsor a forum about Che and invite Carlos Santana and Fontova?
Posted by: jsb
at March 31, 2007 06:58 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

