February 17, 2008

What would JFK do?

The Boston Globe published a surprising editorial today written by Jeff Jacoby that actually—if you can believe this—calls out the appalling and disgraceful choice of office decor by the volunteer at Barrack Obama’s Houston campaign office. Although I have a hard time agreeing with his premise that JFK would have had a much stronger reaction than the less than enthusiastic condemnation offered by Obama, Mr. Jacoby does an admirable, if not excellent job of exposing the myths and duplicitous way in which the murderous thug is portrayed and revered. He also takes the extra step to enlighten those who brandish on their walls and themselves the image of ché, who the homicidal psychopath really was.

The lionizing of [c]he, a sociopath who relished killing and acclaimed "the pedagogy of the firing squad," is not just "inappropriate." It is vile. No American in his right mind would be caught dead wearing a David Duke T-shirt or displaying a poster of Pol Pot. A celebrity who was spotted with a swastika-festooned cap or an actress who revealed that she had gotten a tattoo depicting Timothy McVeigh would inspire only repugnance. No presidential campaign would need more than 30 seconds to sever its ties to anyone, paid staffer or volunteer, whose office was adorned with a Ku Klux Klan banner. Yet [c]he's likeness, which ought to be as loathed as any of those, is instead a trendy bestseller and a cult favorite.

You can read the whole editorial HERE.

Posted by Alberto de la Cruz at February 17, 2008 10:05 AM



Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.babalublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/hut.cgi/7414

Comments

I recall the 1996 election. There's a rather pitiful woman who lives here in Jacksonville. She's poor in both material things and in spirit, so I'll avoid her name. She was a member of a local rag-tag group of people who saw other folks getting ahead through victimology, so, since all the members were poor white people, they called their group The National Association for the Advancement of White People. It was instantly portrayed by the media as a racist organization. The woman became a volunteer in the Pat Buchanan campaign. When it came out that the woman was a member of the NAAWP, Buchanan fired her immediately. Why haven't we seen the same from Barak?

Posted by: Paxety [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 10:37 AM

Jeff Jacoby is one of the good guys. How the Globe continues to allow him to write for them is a mystery. The real story here is that the Gueveragate story FINALLY made it into the MSM.

Posted by: Henry "Conductor" Gomez [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 11:20 AM

It's good the story is getting traction, but I have yet to see it grow legs of any significance. I am sure, however, that if Obama wins the nomination this story will come back from the dead. At that point we'll see how much the MSM is willing to give it air time.

Posted by: albertodelacruz [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 12:02 PM

I do not know what JFK would do, frankly the guy was over rated to play chess with Russians and it showed at Bay of Pigs and the Missile Crisis. We know what Obama and Hillary will do and that is give credits and welfare to the Cuban commies, the question is what would Mac do?, maybe the video link below is the answer:
http://www.martinoticias.com/ocbstory.asp?MediaID=50102

Posted by: Doorgunner [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 12:05 PM

I agree with you, Doorgunner, that JFK was incredibly overrated. An objective assessment of the Bay of Pigs fiasco and the Cuban Missle Crisis illustrates his unbelievably inept abilities to lead. But, he was photogenic and made plenty of speeches with catchy sound bites. In the end, that's all the liberals really need or want.

As far as what would Mac do about Cuba, we won't know for sure until he is in a position, if ever, to do something. But I have no reason to believe he'd take a soft stance. I'm sure he still has nightmares about the tortures he went through at the hands of castro agents.

Hillary and Obama, on the other hand, they'll bend in whichever direction the wind is blowing. They're just looking for the next catchy phrase they can say to appease their supporters.

Isn't it funny how a democratic republic that has become the most powerful nation in the world needs "change," yet neither Hillary nor Obama have ever (to my knowledge) mentioned "cambio" in relation to Cuba? What's next: are they going to start wearing white rubber bracelets with the word "change" on it?

Posted by: albertodelacruz [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 01:36 PM

Of course JFK was overrated. I think the point of the editorial is to use the Dems own beloved Icon against them. It's called Judo.

Posted by: Henry "Conductor" Gomez [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 01:44 PM

Technically, it's called jujitsuor or aikido. Kennedy's action to deny support to the 2506
Brigade and by extention the Cuban underground
was appalling. His refusal to acknowledge intelligence reports of Soviet military personnel,
(which would reach 100,000 troops)material and finally the IRBMs from the summer of 1961; on which lead to the game of 'nuclear chicken' in the
last month; was disgraceful. But he had the pretense to show concern about the issues involved; unlike Clinton & Obama.

Posted by: narciso79 [TypeKey Profile Page] at February 17, 2008 06:18 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?