March 28, 2008
From My Files
Havana - 1952
Another image of what once was, salvaged from a dusty box of Kodachromes, diaries and paperwork.
Lest we forget . . .

Posted by at March 28, 2008 09:48 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.babalublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/hut.cgi/7860
Comments
Do you know where this is? Quite the quality picture for a circa 1952
Posted by: La Ventanita
at March 28, 2008 10:25 AM
Quinta Avenida, Miramar.
Incidentally, El Caballero de Paris was known to sleep on the porch behind the kids from time-to-time.
As for the quality - many of the old Kodachromes I have suffer from fungus outbreaks on the emulsion and the inevitable scratches. There are a select few however that - for whatever the reason - have been preserved quite well.
I am rather fascinated by Kodachromes from the 1930s - the early 50's for the simple reason that I have always known that time period as a "black and white" world. To see an image so well preserved from 1952 - one that looks like it could have been taken last week - is fascinating - in my humble opinion.
Cheers,
-AB
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 28, 2008 10:33 AM
AB:
Is a Kodachrome a slide?
If so, how did you get a digital image?
Posted by: Gusano
at March 28, 2008 12:28 PM
Gusano,
Yes, it is a slide. I own a slide scanner.
Kodachrome was developed in the 1930s and remained the most popular slide film in the world until the 1970s (in my opinion). It was hands down the highest quality - rich saturated colors. It's only donwfall was the fact that it required a highly specialized processing method (I think it was called K12 if I remember correctly) which not every lab could handle - thus most folks used the Kodak mailers to send the rolls up to Rochester. Today, only about two labs remain that continue to process the stuff. It is quite beautiful. I have a hardcover book of 4x5 (large format) Kodachrome landscapes photographed by Ansel Adams in the 1930s and 1940s. They are stunning but not as wonderful as his B/W work.
AB
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 28, 2008 12:31 PM
Gusano -
You are correct. Kodachrome was quite the film in its day. Biggest problem was film speed, ASA 25 and
64 not allowing for "stop action" shots. Ektachrome and its clones started at ASA 64 and had High Speed variants of 125(Indoor) and 160 (Outdoor) which could be "Pushed" quite a bit in development. About 1976, Ektachrome 200 came out first as a "Professional" Film and then as a Consumer item. With newer "fine grain" technology this product was the beginning of "Bye, Bye Kodachrome." Best recollection of processing is that latest for Kodachrome is "K-14"
What also impresses me greatly about this picture is its sharpness. I do NOT think this was taken with a "Brownie" camera. Someone cared enough to get a camera with a REAL LENS. Also, without saying is that this is from when CUBA had an economy as the home looks very well maintained.
CubaWatch - We are all so used to "All-In-Ones" that we forget that separate scanners came with attachments to do just that sort of thing, like my Epson Model 1260, price $69.95 plus tax, five years ago. -S-
Posted by: Dr.Shalit
at March 28, 2008 01:03 PM
I have a box of slides from Cuba & NJ circa 1959. I agree they are incredible.
Share the wealth with the Adams.
Posted by: Gusano
at March 28, 2008 01:05 PM
I believe the image was taken with an Alpa - which was indeed a fine camera in its day.
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 28, 2008 01:15 PM
I still have the camera that took my slides. I'll dig it up when i get home and send you a picture
Posted by: Gusano
at March 28, 2008 02:12 PM
Excellent!
FYI: I'm still shooting with an all-mechanical Leica M6 FILM camera from time-to-time. LOL
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 28, 2008 02:15 PM
where are the labs that you can get the Kodachrome scanned and developed? My father has tons of kodachrome pictures from pre-castro Cuba and we have been looking for a place where we could get them developed into film. Beautiful picture by the way, the quality is amazing, I can't believe its from the 50's.
Posted by: Cuban Dan
at March 28, 2008 05:52 PM
Kodachromes are a bitch to scan, but in my experience the best slides for maintaining color and sharpness. I shot Kodachrome 64 until I discovered Fujichrome velvia 50 which was the new std. for landscape work. Heck I'm all digital now, but I wish My old man had taken color shots with kodachrome. all the prints he took of me as a kid have all faded.
Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier
at March 28, 2008 07:19 PM
CubaWatch -
En mi familia hay una tragedia - Efectamente mi hermana menor ha robada mis viejas cameras 35mm manual, semi-automatico, y automatico. Tengo una Minolta Maxxum 5, y, un Fuji Digital. Prefiero una camera de "FILM," pero las cameras digital hay la onda de la futura. Tambien, una camera "ALPA" fue una de calidad superior en 1952. -S-
Posted by: Dr.Shalit
at March 28, 2008 08:18 PM
Cigar Mike -
Es verdad - Velvia 50 is de-facto the new standard in slide film as long as film is still available as a consumer item, which may NOT be much longer. -S-
Posted by: Dr.Shalit
at March 28, 2008 08:25 PM
I believe this is the last lab in the U.S. still processing K14 (Kodachrome):
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=1147&pq-locale=en_US&_requestid=11135
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 28, 2008 08:52 PM
Where on Quinta Avenida?
Was this house by chance called the Villa Eulalia?
Posted by: cubana12
at March 31, 2008 12:09 AM
Hi cubana12 . . .
Why do you ask?
-Cheers,
AB
Posted by: CubaWatch
at March 31, 2008 10:42 AM
Well, I visited a house that looked just like that when I was in Cuba about five years ago. And it was on Quinta Avenida in Miramar and had a balcony that looks very similar.
I was part of a group of students living there for a semester while attending the University of Havana. I have a few pictures from inside. On the black iron gate outside it said "Villa Eulalia"
My family is originally from the island, and I often thought about the family that had to leave it behind.
Is this the Villa?
Posted by: cubana12
at March 31, 2008 11:28 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

