August 06, 2008
Why is it that...
China does not enjoy the same level of "international solidarity" that the castro regime in Cuba does?
Posted by Henry Louis Gomez at August 6, 2008 08:33 AM
Comments
I think it's because the Chinese government embraces, although to a severely limited degree, capitalist ideals when it comes to business. They repress the freedoms of the common people to the delight of the leftist establishment in the West, but it really pisses them off when the Chinese use Western capitalist ideals to run their businesses.
Posted by: albertodelacruz
at August 6, 2008 09:01 AM
That's because all the leftists who worship the Dalai Lama, like Richard Gere, are calling for boycotting the Olympics, bashing China, etc.
Posted by: mrcs_Concepcion
at August 6, 2008 09:04 AM
Possibly because China does not make a big, loud, showy deal of being anti-American. Next to Castro, Inc., the Chinese are far more discreet and subtle. Also, China and its brand of totalitarianism was never nearly as fashionable or as hip as the Russian version among Western "progressives," and Cuba obviously went for the Russian version. Also, China is how and where it is mainly due to Chinese factors, not because Western media bastards made Mao a star, for instance. There are still lots of people, influential people, who have long supported Castro, Inc. one way or another, and they can't bear to "lose face" by admitting that was seriously wrong.
Posted by: asombra
at August 6, 2008 09:11 AM
Possibly because China does not make a big, loud, showy deal of being anti-American.
Bingo!
That's what I think it is.
Posted by: Henry Louis Gomez
at August 6, 2008 09:30 AM
Fontova's answer:
because China is much freer than Cuba. When Mao ran China she was every bit as popular as Cuba, as was The USSR when Stalin ran it. It was only when these mass-murderers passed that the sheen wore off for Useful Idiots. Same will happen in Cuba, you watch. When some "China-model" finally kicks in--that's finally when Castro-mania will begin fading among the Intelligentsia. The more repressive (especially by a single charismatic" figure) a regime, the more popular it is for pinks.
Posted by: Henry Louis Gomez
at August 6, 2008 09:40 AM
It's all about Tibet. We conservatives and classical Liberals (note the capital L - there is a difference in classical vs. everyday liberalism leftism) want Tibet to be free the same way leftists also want it to be free because for them, the American left, it's a trendy thing and kind of a 1960s hippie thing.
and China doesn't have the "Afro Cuban experience" that many leftists travel to Cuba to enjoy - if you catch my drift.
Posted by: mandingo
at August 6, 2008 12:20 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

