August 28, 2008
Obama campaign: Free speech unacceptable
As the coronation was underway in Denver, back home in Chicago Stanley Kurtz went on Milt Rosenberg’s radio program, "Extension 720," to discuss newly released documents chronicling Obama’s association with Ayers while working on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
Obama lied about his relationship with Ayers:
Obama supporters risibly complain that shining a light on the Obama/Ayers relationship is a “smear” and smacks of “guilt by association.” A presidential candidate’s choice to associate himself with an unrepentant terrorist would be highly relevant in any event — does anyone think the Obamedia would keep mum if John McCain had a long-standing relationship with David Duke or an abortion-clinic bomber?But we are talking about more than a mere “association.”
Bluntly, Obama has lied about his relationship with Ayers, whom he now dismisses as “a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” Ayers and Obama have made joint appearances together; they have argued together for “reforms” of the criminal justice system to make it more criminal-friendly; Obama gushed with praise for Ayers’ 1997 polemical book on the Chicago courts; and they sat together for three years on the board of the Woods Fund, a left-wing enterprise that distributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to their ideological allies. Most significant, they worked closely together on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC).
The CAC was a major education reform project, proposed by Ayers, which was underwritten by a $49.2 million grant from the Annenberg Foundation, complemented by another $100 million in private and public funding. The project ran for about five years, beginning in 1995. As the liberal researcher Steve Diamond has recounted, Ayers ran its operational arm, the “Chicago School Reform Collaborative.” Obama, then a 33-year-old, third-year associate at a small law firm, having no executive experience, was brought in to chair the board of directors, which oversaw all “fiscal matters.”
By the time the CAC’s operations were wound down in 2001 it had doled out more than $100 million in grants but had failed to achieve any improvement in the Chicago schools. What little is known about the grants Obama oversaw is troubling. As Diamond relates, one of the first CAC awards in 1995 was $175,000 for the “Small Schools Workshop,” which had been founded by Ayers and was then headed by Mike Klonsky. It was only the beginning of the CAC’s generous funding of Klonsky — a committed Maoist who had been an Ayers comrade in the radical Students for a Democratic Society (the forerunner of Ayers’ Weatherman terrorist organization), and who hosted a “social justice” blog on the Obama campaign website until his writings were hastily purged in June after Diamond called attention to them.
The Obama campaign declined Rosenberg’s invitation to have a representative on the show, choosing instead to issue an “Obama Action Wire” encouraging supporters to disrupt Kurtz’s appearance which it deemed “unacceptable.” So much for free speech.
Read the National Review Online editorial here, and don't miss Michelle Malkin's coverage here.
Posted by Ziva at August 28, 2008 03:49 PM
Comments
This entire episode is a fascinating read. And I can't wait until Stan Kurtz finishes his review of the records ~ whatever they've given him. Unless, of course, they've already washed and destroyed the smoking guns, as I fear they have done.
It's a freaking scary preview of things to come if this abomination gets into the oval office.If we keep tolerating this kind of (yes I will say it) persecution from the left, always poised as they are to kill dissent or facts that expose them for what they are, then we may end up someday with the type of propaganda billboards that Yoani posted on her website in photographs (excellent shots of the crapola that dots her neighborhood).
Just like the Greco-Roman empire, we can destroy ourselves from within. (That Greek temple in Denver is a bad omen, IMHO.)
Notice that the Obie supporters never engage in a debate of the facts thrown at them; no, they want to nip it in the bud and to obliterate any disagreement from the outset by calling the facts "a smear tactic" ~ just like using that race card ~ and for those who don't want to be called smear mongers or racists, it will effectively kill the debate before it has a chance to start.
Just like Col. Jessup, they can't handle the truth.
Posted by: Gigi
at August 28, 2008 04:56 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

