September 24, 2008

Palin Derangement Syndrome is getting really bad out there

From Michelle Malkin's site:

The latest issue [of Rolling Stone] just happens to have the headline “The Lies of Sarah Palin” splashed all over it. An excerpt of the PDS-infected Matt Taibbi’s screed:
Palin is a symbol of everything that is wrong with the modern United States. As a representative of our political system, she’s a new low in reptilian villainy, the ultimate cynical masterwork of puppeteers like Karl Rove. But more than that, she is a horrifying symbol of how little we ask for in return for the total surrender of our political power. Not only is Sarah Palin a fraud, she’s the tawdriest, most half-assed fraud imaginable, 20 floors below the lowest common denominator, a character too dumb even for daytime TV — and this country is going to eat her up, cheering her every step of the way. All because most Americans no longer have the base energy to do anything but lie back and allow ourselves to be jacked off by the calculating thieves who run this grasping consumer paradise we call a nation…

…She appeared to be completely without shame and utterly full of shit, awing a room full of hardened reporters with her sickly-sweet line about the high-school-flame-turned-hubby who “five children later,” is “still my guy.” It was like watching Gidget address the Reichstag.

Folks, I'm stupefied at this kind of language being vomited out by the left. It's extraordinary! Is it just me, or are these people living on a different planet than the rest of us? Evil forces are afoot in the world, mark my word.

Posted by George Moneo at September 24, 2008 01:59 PM



Comments

Don't get me wrong. Pat Buchanan is not my kind of guy. I disagree with him on a whole lot and hate it when he is identified as a conservative. He is not my idea of a conservative.

However, I am reminded of his speech to the Rep convention where he got an extended ovation, the gist of which was there is a war going on in this country and if we don't recognize it in time, it could do us in. The press afterward misused this speech and forgot the happy applause of agreement he got from it from the people there. But, look, he was right. I was in sympathy with him about that and have not changed my mind in the decades since he said those things. There was a war going on for the hearts and minds of Americans then, but now it is codified and funded and organized. But it is still easily identifiable so we can still expose it and minimize its effects. We just have to want to do that.

Posted by: honey [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:12 PM

The far left are vile, nasty, cowardly, pansies, akin to puss filled canker sores on society.

Heck, even Bill Clinton gives Palin the modicum of respect she deserves.

But what do you expect from Rolling Stone?

Heck, I would even wrap mullet or line bird cages with Rolling Stone.

Rolling Stone Magazine is not even worthy to line the cages at the Westminster Dog Show or Rosie O'Donnell's outhouse.

Rolling Stone Magazine is for the vermin of America; the Daily Kos, the lefty pothead radicals who cream in their pants when they read Chomsky, who get che tattoed on their crotch, and who are dying to perform fellatio on Obama .....

a really sick group of horse excrement

Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:18 PM

I have suspicion Bill Clinton may have another motive in mind when he is kind to Palin. How anxious is he for an Obama win?
On the other hand, Palin just might remain popular and be as wonderful as we think she is.

Posted by: honey [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:26 PM

honey, clinton is the master politician. he knows the "american audience"

he'd win today if he ran against mccain and obama.

you know he wants obama to lose, but his comments on Palin are right on.

it's ok to say you don't agree with Palin's views, but to attack her like they have, it's vile.

Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:29 PM

Rolling Stone, please...Does anyone even read that garbage?

Posted by: readytoshoot [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:29 PM

Rolling Stone and US Magazine are both published by Jan Wenner.

Posted by: Jonathan [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 02:59 PM

Read Malkin's piece: they are mailing thousands of free copies to non-subscribers they find on mailing lists.

Posted by: George L. Moneo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 03:20 PM

Consider the source: the left is wetting their Fruit of the Looms because Palin has energized the ticket and the conservative base, and Barry's poll numbers are going south; that's why they are going after her.

PLUS, please remember that the left, if and when it engages in a debate, can NEVER win in the marketplace of ideas - they always lose the argument during reality checks because they're shackled to a losing philosophy that doesn't work in a free society, it only survives under repressive rule. Thus the ad hominem attacks; get'ng down 'n dirty is further proof that they're scared: they can't win consistently on the issues so they must resort to filth and trust their base of [still] unwashed ignorant masses that insist on supporting them, to show up on election day.

Posted by: Gigi [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 04:34 PM

Wow. That's beyond the typical vitriol. And what is Taibbi's problem with Palin's enjoyment of her marriage? I guess it's just not "cosmopolitan" enough. She should be bored and jaded with her husband to impress the lefty psycho ward.

Frankly, all this vile spewing makes me think one thing: they're all afraid of Palin. Which really means she's given McCain a good shot at the White House....

Posted by: dramaturge [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 06:32 PM

Oh Lord, Mad Mike complaining about the vitriol of the Left? Ha! No, really, you're joking, right?


.

Posted by: Rick [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 08:27 PM

Rick, if asshole kool-aid drinkers like you would disavow this vile crap, you'd be justified in saying what you said. But you don't because secretly (or not so secretly) you like it. Until you do disavow it, you and your ilk are exactly as Mike describes you. And I think he's being soft on you.

Posted by: George L. Moneo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 08:38 PM

Rick, thanks for the link. For those visiting let me say that writing the word "fuck" or "asshole," or using them to accurately describe you, Rick, is not the same as the wholesale slandering and libeling of a sitting governor and a mother. While I would never shrink from calling you an asshole, I would never applaud a skit on national TV that implies that the husband of Gov. Palin had an incestuous affair with their daughter. Or write pieces, in very clean language, that accuses her, in the most incendiary terms possible, of heinous, vile things that, in the end, are proven untrue. I'd venture to bet you'd allow a slanderous story about Gov. Palin to pass on your site as long as your hypocritical, feminized sensibility about curse words wasn't violated. Please, sod off, Rick. You are lib buddies have gone far beyond just curse words and graduated to another level altogether.

Posted by: George L. Moneo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 10:06 PM

Here's a very clean one for you Ricky Boy, that implies Gov. Palin will do to Jews and Blacks what she does when she hunts moose.

If Sarah Palin isn’t enough of a reason for you to get over whatever your problem is with Barack Obama, then you damn well had better pay attention. [...] Anybody toting guns and stripping moose don’t care too much about what they do with Jews and blacks. So, you just think this through. --Alcee Hastings

Do you repudiate his statement? Yes or no answer only please.

Posted by: George L. Moneo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 10:17 PM

Again, George, it's the height of hypocrisy for you to call out anyone on vulgar language. And, for Pete's sake, quit your whining. I've come to expect so much more from you.

.

Posted by: Rick [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 10:19 PM

George, shove your "please" and your question. I'm sodding off, remember?

Wait for the outrage in 4...3...2...1.....

.

Posted by: Rick [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 10:22 PM

You didn't read what I wrote, dickhead: vulgar language is not the same as slander. But never mind. The big man with his high and mighty convictions has answered my question for all to see exactly as I thought he would. Thanks, Rick.

Posted by: George L. Moneo [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 10:27 PM

Bill and Hillary Clinton have had a marriage of convenience for decades. Each one pursues their individual sexual affairs without interference from the other. Their daughter Chelsea is emulating them. She is almost 30, has never been married, and has gone through a string of lovers that treat her like weekend pussy.

Posted by: mulatica [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 11:02 PM

Rick, I call a spade a spade in their own language.

the truth hurts

Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 24, 2008 11:20 PM

George:
They're freakish enemies against normal.
The hard left loathes her pro-life stance (icluding taking Trig to term which affronts their sense of 'choice') her very normal life and the fact that she genuinely loves her family and takes her job seriously but not so seriously that it consumes everything in her life

xavier

Posted by: xavier [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 25, 2008 11:06 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?