October 15, 2008
"Spread the wealth"?
No thank you, asshole! I'd rather keep what I have.
Did I already say I think Obama is a Marxist? I did? Never mind.
(H/T HotAir)
Posted by George Moneo at October 15, 2008 08:20 AM
Comments
You know, what pisses me off the most about all of this "wealth distribution" crap is that liberals try to guilt you into it. They say stuff like "it's our responsibility as a society to help those poor families with six kids and so on." Well, where the hell was the parents of those six kid's responsibility towards us when they were, you know, MAKING those six kids?
Posted by: Val Prieto
at October 15, 2008 08:42 AM
What pisses me off even more is that these pinheads want the government to force us to give up more money in taxes for their wealth distribution ideas when they are not even willing to give up their own wealth voluntarily.
Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier
at October 15, 2008 09:36 AM
How many people you know live in million dollar homes? How about Obama selling his home, buying a run of the mill house and giving all the money to the poor. What a hypocryte! Even when he was a "Community Organizer" he was working HIS WAY UP the ladder and hustling with Rezko into his million dollar mansion.
The same can be said about Raines, Johnson, Pelosi, Dodd, Franks, Jackson, and the rest of the Socialists in Congress.
This is my message to all the these Con Artists...Give all your money away before you come and get mine!
Posted by: Firefly
at October 15, 2008 09:57 AM
Val & Mike -
Take it up a notch. Whaddabout the large percentage of the electorate that agree with "spread the wealth" without working for it.
Firefly -
After one year working for $13,000 as a "Community Organizer," Sen. Obama apparently resolved that "Doing Good" did NOT preclude "Doing Well." He has not looked back since.
-S-
Posted by: Dr.Shalit
at October 15, 2008 10:05 AM
Doc, they deserve it because of what some folks did in North America 400 years ago.
Heck, 400 years ago, my family was in Europe somewhere fighting antisemitism. Heck my family was thrown out of Russia before the Russian Revolution because they were Jews.
The other half of my family was thrown out of Cuba because they opposed Communism. I guess I'm entitled to some of that wealth from the government too huh?
Posted by: Cigar Mike Pancier
at October 15, 2008 10:22 AM
Val, you are so right. I only had one child so that I could give her the best that I could afford. I've never asked for a free ride and have been working since I was a teenager. Why should I share my wealth with someone that decided they would have as many kids as the government could support for them, never worried about how they would pay all the expenses because afterall, they get handouts. It's my money, I'm keeping it.
Posted by: ORGULLOSADESERCUBANA
at October 15, 2008 10:45 AM
I'm with orgullosa. I have one child for that reason. I work to give her the best I can and I've been working all my life.
BTW, no one has mentioned the irony that El Berracko was talking to a plumber who apparently had the sense to smell the "one's "crap" a mile away. He should have used his plunger on him.
Posted by: pixelchik
at October 15, 2008 11:47 AM
I am 100% in favor of spreading the wealth of every single person who votes for Obama. I, however, would like to keep my so-called "wealth" in my pocket. If they want to share, let them. My kindgerten teacher wrote "doesn't like to share" on my report card and not much has changed.
Posted by: Claudia4Libertad
at October 15, 2008 09:59 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

