November 13, 2008
Kennedy-Khrushchev
I was having a discussion today with someone who tried to sell me on the idea that the Kennedy-Khrushchev Pact is in fact a figment of the imaginations of intransigent Cuban-Americans.
The truth is that Kennedy-Khrushchev pact or the "Kennedy-Khrushchev Understandings" as they are better known by historians are series of 24 letters exchanged between Kennedy and Khrushchev between October and December 1962. Some may pretend that this little chapter in history never happened but like Elvis once said, "truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away."
Here's some relevant excerpts from the letters courtesy of the United States State Department. Emphasis is mine:
Telegram From the Embassy in the Soviet Union to the Department of State Moscow, October 26, 1962, 7 p.m.You once said that the United States was not preparing an invasion. But you also declared that you sympathized with the Cuban counter-revolutionary emigrants, that you support them and would help them to realize their plans against the present Government of Cuba. It is also not a secret to anyone that the threat of armed attack, aggression, has constantly hung, and continues to hang over Cuba. It was only this which impelled us to respond to the request of the Cuban Government to furnish it aid for the strengthening of the defensive capacity of this country.
If assurances were given by the President and the Government of the United States that the USA itself would not participate in an attack on Cuba and would restrain others from actions of this sort, if you would recall your fleet, this would immediately change everything. I am not speaking for Fidel Castro, but I think that he and the Government of Cuba, evidently, would declare demobilization and would appeal to the people to get down to peaceful labor. Then, too, the question of armaments would disappear, since, if there is no threat, then armaments are a burden for every people. Then too, the question of the destruction, not only of the armaments which you call offensive, but of all other armaments as well, would look different...
Let us therefore show statesmanlike wisdom. I propose: We, for our part, will declare that our ships, bound for Cuba, will not carry any kind of armaments. You would declare that the United States will not invade Cuba with its forces and will not support any sort of forces which might intend to carry out an invasion of Cuba. Then the necessity for the presence of our military specialists in Cuba would disappear...
There, Mr. President, are my thoughts, which, if you agreed with them, could put an end to that tense situation which is disturbing all peoples.
Letter From Chairman Khrushchev to President Kennedy
Moscow, October 27, 1962.We, in making this pledge, in order to give satisfaction and hope of the peoples of Cuba and Turkey and to strengthen their confidences in their security, will make a statement within the framework of the Security Council to the effect that the Soviet Government gives a solemn promise to respect the inviolability of the borders and sovereignty of Turkey, not to interfere in its internal affairs, not to invade Turkey, not to make available our territory as a bridgehead for such an invasion, and that it would also restrain those who contemplate committing aggression against Turkey, either from the territory of the Soviet Union or from the territory of Turkey's other neighboring states.
The United States Government will make a similar statement within the framework of the Security Council regarding Cuba. It will declare that the United States will respect the inviolability of Cuba's borders and its sovereignty, will pledge not to interfere in its internal affairs, not to invade Cuba itself or make its territory available as a bridgehead for such an invasion, and will also restrain those who might contemplate committing aggression against Cuba, either from the territory of the United States or from the territory of Cuba's other neighboring states...
The means situated in Cuba, of which you speak and which disturb you, as you have stated, are in the hands of Soviet officers. Therefore, any accidental use of them to the detriment of the United States is excluded. These means are situated in Cuba at the request of the Cuban Government and are only for defense purposes. Therefore, if there is no invasion of Cuba, or attack on the Soviet Union or any of our other allies, then of course these means are not and will not be a threat to anyone. For they are not for purposes of attack.
If you are agreeable to my proposal, Mr. President, then we would send our representatives to New York, to the United Nations, and would give them comprehensive instructions in order that an agreement may be reached more quickly. If you also select your people and give them the corresponding instructions, then this question can be quickly resolved.
Telegram From the Department of State to the Embassy in the Soviet Union
Washington, October 27, 1962, 8:05 p.m.
Dear Mr. Chairman:I have read your letter of October 26th/1/ with great care and welcomed the statement of your desire to seek a prompt solution to the problem. The first thing that needs to be done, however, is for work to cease on offensive missile bases in Cuba and for all weapons systems in Cuba capable of offensive use to be rendered inoperable, under effective United Nations arrangements.
Assuming this is done promptly, I have given my representatives in New York instructions that will permit them to work out this weekend--in cooperation with the Acting Secretary General and your representative--an arrangement for a permanent solution to the Cuban problem along the lines suggested in your letter of October 26th. As I read your letter, the key elements of your proposals--which seem generally acceptable as I understand them--are as follows:
1) You would agree to remove these weapons systems from Cuba under appropriate United Nations observation and supervision; and undertake, with suitable safeguards, to halt the further introduction of such weapons systems into Cuba.
2) We, on our part, would agree--upon the establishment of adequate arrangements through the United Nations to ensure the carrying out and continuation of these commitments--(a) to remove promptly the quarantine measures now in effect and (b) to give assurances against an invasion of Cuba. I am confident that other nations of the Western Hemisphere would be prepared to do likewise.
Letter From Chairman Khrushchev to President Kennedy
Moscow, October 28, 1962.DEAR MR. PRESIDENT: I have received your message of October 27./1/ I express my satisfaction and thank you for the sense of proportion you have displayed and for realization of the responsibility which now devolves on you for the preservation of the peace of the world.
And just like that President Kennedy, a hero to fools, stabbed Cubans in the back for the SECOND time.
Posted by Henry Louis Gomez at November 13, 2008 11:12 PM
Comments
Knowing this is one thing, seeing it in black and white, as they say, is devastating. Dear God, what that cowardly fool wrought.
Posted by: Ziva Sahl
at November 14, 2008 12:07 AM
Check out April 3, 1963 memorandum from the Soviets to Kennedy:
"You have said that the U.S. Government is fulfilling its promise to withdraw missiles from Turkey and Italy and that that would be completed during the first half of April [1963]."
The Soviets publicly removed from Cuba 42 missiles with 20 nuclear warheads. The U.S. secretly removed from Turkey 15 nuclear missiles; 30 nuclear missiles from Italy; and 64 nuclear missiles from Great Britain. Total: 109 U.S. missiles withdrawn for the 42 removed from Cuba.
Kennedy also allowed a Soviet combat brigade to remain on the island, which was not removed until the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Kennedy negotiated from a position of weakness and fear. During his entire presidency he was heavily medicated due to his back pains and other ailments. It apparently affected his perception and logic.
Posted by: delacova
at November 14, 2008 12:19 AM
Donald Kagan's "On Origins of War" shatters the myth that the Cuban Missle Crisis was a win for Kennedy and the US. He points out that the US clearly lost a whole lot more than it gained.
Posted by: theCardinal
at November 14, 2008 06:36 AM
Wasn't that traitor shot in Dallas or something to that effect ?
