January 16, 2009
Riots? Does MSNBC rewrite to make Cuban-Americans look bad?
There's an MSNBC story circulating on the web about Fidel Castro's possible room temperature status that includes the following line:
When the news of Castro's death is made public, riots are expected in Little Havana, similar to the one when he stepped down from power.
There's another version of the same story from an ABC station where the word "celebrations" is used instead of "riots":
When the news of Castro's death is made public, celebrations are expected in Little Havana, similar to the one when he stepped down from power.
It's unclear which version of the story is the original but once thing is certain: there were NO RIOTS when the chairman of castro, inc. stepped down during the summer of 2006. Not even close.
H/T: freedom4cuba
UPDATE:
George from therealcuba.com leaves this observation in the comments:
If you look at the end of the ABC story it says: Copyright 2009 by WPBF.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.MSNBC attributes the story to WPBF, but it violated the copyright by changing it.
There is no doubt that the ABC station wrote it and MSNBC changed it to make Cuban-Americans look bad.
UPDATE #2:
It appears that WPBF originally wrote the piece with the word "riots" based on google's cache of the page. The story was then apparently picked up by MSNBC and only afterwards did WPBF correct it. And they say blogs are error prone.
Posted by Henry Louis Gomez at January 16, 2009 09:55 AM
Comments
Leave it to the MSM to confuse "riot" and "party".
Posted by: Paco
at January 15, 2009 11:33 PM
A riot of joy, laughter, merriment, more joy, hilarity, gladness, relief, and still more joy, until we all fall down with exhaustion waiting for the other motherfucker to die. There. I said it. I'm such a hard-liner...
Posted by: Universal Spectator
at January 15, 2009 11:56 PM
Paco,
I don't believe they are "confused." It's very intentional. It's no wonder Rush Limbaugh calls them "The Drive by Media." They throw the mud and hope some of it sticks.
Posted by: Firefly
at January 16, 2009 12:10 AM
LMAO! Any way to copy these pages for future references? I wouldn't be surprised if there's a switch-e-roo.
Posted by: j2tharome
at January 16, 2009 12:41 AM
Of course we're supposed to riot. We're brown-skinned, third-world minorities remember? ;)
Posted by: Robert
at January 16, 2009 07:34 AM
If you look at the end of the ABC story it says: Copyright 2009 by WPBF.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
MSNBC attributes the story to WPBF, but it violated the copyright by changing it.
There is no doubt that the ABC station wrote it and MSNBC changed it to make Cuban-Americans look bad.
Posted by: therealcuba
at January 16, 2009 07:46 AM
As Robert says, it's part of the mainstream media's racism. We are supposed to be brown-skinned, third world minorities. And that's what we do: riot, live in ghettos, rob, etc... If you look at Hollywood, they do the same thing. Look at CSI: Miami, look at any program where Cuban Americans are depicted.
When Elian was kidnapped from his relative's home by Janet Reno's jack-booted stormtroopers, the media repeated the same lies and said that Cubans were rioting in Little Havana.
Meanwhile, when Afro-Americans in Louisiana-- after Katrina--- started looting left and right, the media had to take back their words and rephrase everything after black activists protested. Everything instantly became sanitized and controlled.
The analogy doesn't perfectly fit because in one case, Cubans are willfully SLANDERED--and in the other the media told the truth about Afro-Americans, however, I point it out to illustrate how they differently they treat the two groups.
With Cubans, they have a field day, they say whatever they feel like saying regardless of how much of a distortion and how slanderous it is, and with Afro-Americans, they walk around on eggshells.
Posted by: Rayarena
at January 16, 2009 08:14 AM
Unfortunately, to all too many people, this is utterly insignificant and totally a non-issue. And in some cases, they may genuinely not even understand why we're offended. Of course, in most cases, they know perfectly well what's going on here, but they figure, so what? Screw "those people" (as Clinton called us).
Posted by: asombra
at January 16, 2009 12:25 PM
Asombra,
You are absolutely right.
Posted by: Rayarena
at January 16, 2009 02:18 PM
Henry, the only thing that I don't understand is why the ABC story that was posted at 12:21 AM on Thursday has the word "celebrations" and the one that was posted by MSNBC that says "updated" at 5:19 PM on Thursday, 17 hours later, is the one that has the word "riots."
Shouldn't it have been the other way around?
Posted by: therealcuba
at January 16, 2009 02:38 PM
When the righteous prosper, the city rejoices; when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy (PR 11:10). I too will be hosting a DEAD CASTRO party and it will definitely be a riot!
