Caught on video, police brutality in Havana

A young man in Havana beaten for not carrying his id. Please share this, expose the brutality of the police state in Cuba.

Via Twitter:

The Abolition of the Wet Foot-Dry Foot Immigration Policy Not A Bad Move

Following is my latest letter-to-the-editor that the Washington Times published on January 20, 2017.

Mr. Antonio Benedí bemoans the repeal of the “wet foot, dry foot” immigration policy by President Obama (“Obama’s betrayal of the Cuban people,” Web, Jan. 17). Said policy puts Cubans who reach U.S. soil on a fast track to permanent residency. He and I disagree on this issue.

First, let’s correct the record. Mr. Benedí indicates that this policy was put in place in response to former President Bill Clinton’s handling of the Elian Gonzalez incident. This is simply not factual. The policy was started in 1995 by President Clinton as a preventive measure against a mass exodus of Cuban refugees after Fidel Castro threatened another exodus of Cubans to protest the U.S. embargo. The Elian Gonzalez incident took place in 2000, long after the policy was firmly in place.

President Obama’s decision to abolish the “wet foot, dry foot” rule was the right one to take, and it’s been long overdue. When most Cubans who benefitted from this policy in the past returned to Communist Cuba repeatedly after obtaining their residency by living for one year and one day in the United States, it transformed them from political refugees to economic immigrants. They ceased to be “political refugees” — people afraid to return to their home countries for fear their lives would be endangered. To afford these Cubans special privileges that were denied immigrants of other nationalities was in itself discriminatory and challenging to our fair-play values. So kudos to President Obama for ending this “pachanga” once and for all.

To restore freedom and democracy to Communist Cuba, it is the Cubans who have to trigger a ‘Cuban Spring.’ The “wet foot, dry foot” policy provided an escape valve to shirk this responsibility. It provided the Cuban government with a lifeline into the future by getting rid of most of the regime’s dissenters. Those dissidents who remained in Cuba were then either locked up in Cuban gulags or killed by Communist thugs. With the repeal of the policy, there will be enough dissidents in Cuba to provide the spark for the liberation movement that will untie the chains that have oppressed Cuban citizens for over 57 years.

To view Mr. Benedí’s op-ed, click on

What’s next for Cuba?


While having lunch with a Cuban friend in beautiful St. Petersburg, Florida, he was optimistic that better days awaited Cuba after the passing of Fidel Castro in November of 2016. His hope was that with this strongman no longer on the scene, democratic reforms would be introduced gradually in Cuba.

My Cuban friend is not alone in expecting that hope and change will come to Cuba in 2017. Ben Rhodes, the Deputy National Security Advisor to President Obama, opined that the death of Fidel Castro provided a golden opportunity for a political transition in Cuba.

I disagree with the previous assessments as I am a faithful follower of the saying by the prominent American abolitionist Frederick Douglass:

“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”

Even taking into account Raul Castro’s promise to retire in 2018, Fidel and Raul Castro have planned the continuity of the communist regime by placing key supporters in the armed forces and in the government bureaucracy. The armed forces are in control of 65 percent of the economy, while 14 members of the Politburo are military men. Moreover, the children of Fidel and Raul and their extended families occupy important positions in the Cuban Government. Raul’s son Alejandro is the regime’s intelligence chief, while his son-in-law, Luis Alberto Rodríguez López-Callejas, is in charge of the Cuban military’s business operations. With the majority of them in their fifties, they will remain key players for many years to come. In addition, the Cuban Government retains full control of the Cuban news media, which is well adept at keeping Cubans in the dark.

With all the hoopla associated with President Obama’s new Cuba policy of December 2014, things have not changed for the better in the Caribbean Island. Any political activity or political dissent that are not aligned with the Communist Party of Cuba remain criminal offenses. Dissidents are spied on, harassed, and roughed up by the state-supported vigilante committees. The Cuban Commission for Human Rights and National Reconciliation documented 8,616 cases of politically motivated arbitrary arrests in 2015, and 9,484 arrests through November of 2016 – making possible that the number could reach 10,000. Reporters Without Borders rank Cuba 171 out of 180 countries for press freedom – worse than Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Zimbabwe.

So, in other to restore democracy to Communist Cuba, there has to be a Cuban Spring that mirrors the Arab Spring that spread across the Middle East in early 2011. Cubans living in Cuba have to wake up and say once and for all that they’ve have had enough of lies, oppression, lack of civil and human rights, and totalitarian rule. They have to fill out the streets and plazas with their chants of “no más.” They have to take up arms and be willing to die for the cause of freedom to their homeland. The have to do it by themselves – without expecting to receive the help of Americans, Cuban-Americans, or any other groups throughout the world. No government can withstand the wrath of the majority of its own citizens.

But, in order to ignite the spark of revolution, the escape valve known as the Cuban Adjustment Act has to be repealed. Rather than fight for a Cuba Libre, many Cubans take the easy way out afforded by this law and emigrate to the United States. This provides the Cuban Government with a lifeline into the future by getting rid of most of its dissenters. Those dissidents that remain in Cuba are then either locked up in Cuban gulags or killed by communist thugs. What is left are the frustrated but obedient citizens, and you cannot make revolutions out of this group. With the repeal of the Cuban Adjustment Act, there will be enough dissidents in Cuba to provide the spark for the liberation movement that will untie the chains that have oppressed the Cuban citizens for over fifty-seven years of communist rule.

President-elect Trump has a golden opportunity to help the forces of freedom by demanding — as condition precedents to the normalization process with Cuba — religious and political liberalization, the freeing of all political prisoners, and the payment of the $8 billion debt owed to U.S. businesses after the Cuban Government confiscated their properties. If Raul fails to meet the U.S. demands, President Trump can reverse President Obama’s concessions by rescinding all executive orders on the Cuban policy. The fact that Mauricio Claver-Carone, executive director of the U.S.-Cuba Democracy Political Action Committee (USCD PAC) and Yleen Poblete, former chief of staff for U.S. Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, are now in the transition team are indicative that President Trump will make the right moves to restore democracy to Cuba.

It’s Time To Put America First Again!


Democratic Vice-Presidential Candidate Tim Kaine from Virginia stated in tonight’s debate that if you cannot tell the difference between leadership and dictatorship, you need to go back to school to take a 5th-grade class in civics. He followed up later on and said that if you cannot tell the difference between the two, you should not be commander in chief. By his own admission, Tim Kaine disqualified Hillary Clinton as a suitable candidate for the Oval Office and  made President Obama into a failed commander in chief.

President Obama launched a new initiative to Communist Cuba in December of 2014, and Hillary Clinton has repeatedly indicated that she will follow President Obama’s policy on Cuba. Communist Cuba has been oppressed by the Castro Brothers’ brutal dictatorship for fifty-seven years!

It’s time to roll out the Panamanian Boxer Roberto Durán’s policy of “no más”: “no más”hypocrisy, no more double-talk, no more signing deals with enemies of the United States, no more trade deals that leave tax-paying Americans out of good-paying jobs, “no más” putting the lives of Americans in jeopardy.

It’s time to put America first again!

Agreeing with Che Guevara? What Has This World Come To?!!!

It is not often that you’ll see me agree with a Che Guevara saying. After reading the article below, I agree with Che that “no se vive de esfuerzos, sino de resultados (one does not measure success by the efforts, but by the results). The Cuban Revolution under Fidel and Raul Castro has turned out to be “La Gran Estafa” (a big rip-off) for the Cuban people.

Read the New Yorker article HERE.

The Castro Regime and doing business in Cuba

(My new American Thinker post)

Last December, many welcomed President Obama’s opening to Cuba as an opportunity to bring prosperity to the island. It went something like this: American tourists will spend money in Cuba and freedom will blossom. The other version went like this: our past approach has not worked so let’s try something new. Another one went like this: Cubans will talk to Americans and demand multiparty elections and a free press.

Sorry, but U.S.-Cuba relations have not worked out as planned or dreamed. There are two big reasons. The first reason is that the Castro regime is not about to relax political control. On the contrary, there has been a rise in repression and more and more dissidents find it difficult to express themselves. The second reason is that the Castro regime wants to keep control of the cash flow. This is from Fox News Latino:

The Cuban government, Lee said, still clearly “prefers to channel all business opportunities to state-run enterprises.”

And why not?  The Obama approach has been completely one sided. The U.S. gives up everything and Cuba gives nothing. The Castro brothers have concluded that they will ask and Obama will provide. So far so good for the dictatorship.

The Cuban government needs these state enterprises under the Castro Inc. holding company. It allows the Castro brothers to get wealthy, it keeps property ownership from the Cuban people and turns the island into a Spanish speaking Vietnam with good baseball players.

Mauricio Tamargo, an attorney, wrote recently about Cuban finances,or better put, the Castro family finances:

Forbes Magazine used to list both Castro brothers on its list of the top 100 richest people in the world. Forbes later removed the Castro brothers from the “Top 100” after the Cuban government objected, indicating those Swiss bank accounts in both Fidel and Raul’s names are held by the Castro brothers on “behalf of the Cuban people.”

Again, why should the Cuban government want to give up control of the economy? “Fidelismo” has been very good for the family bank accounts, the gang that surrounds and protects the dictator and all of those state enterprises that collect dollars and pay Cubans in worthless pesos.

The Obama administration moved too fast and never demanded concessions from a cash starved dictator about to lose his energy subsidy from Venezuela. We had all of the cards and could have done more for the Cuban people. Instead, the Obama team pleased the left wing college professors in U.S. universities and threw the Cuban people under the bus.

Prosperity coming to Cuba? It won’t happen until there is a regime change.

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.